Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jones v. Stofferahn et al
as 0:2023cv02386
Plaintiff:
Austin Jeffrey Jones
Defendant:
Anthony C Stofferahn, Robert J Conway, Margaret Astrup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson et al v. Bates County, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
Gary Anderson and Julianne Anderson
Defendant:
Bates County, Missouri, Matthew Weiss, Hugh Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
William Hughes, II v. Team Car Care, LLC
as 23-2531
Plaintiff / Appellee:
William A. Hughes, II
Defendant / Appellant:
Team Car Care, LLC, doing business as Jiffy Lube
Houle v. City of Duluth et al
as 0:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Brandon Houle
Defendant:
City of Duluth, Officer Adam Huot, Officer Morgan Cekalla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ind.-Alliance Party of Minn., et al v. Steve Simon
as 23-1074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Independence-Alliance Party of Minnesota and Hugh McTavish
Defendant / Appellee:
Steve Simon, in his official capacity as the Minnesota secretary of state, or his successor
Hughes v. Team Car Care LLC
as 4:2022cv01375
Plaintiff:
William A. Hughes, II
Defendant:
Team Car Care LLC doing business as Jiffy Lube
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
