Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Cambell v. Hyatt et al
as 4:2023cv01547
Plaintiff:
Lamont Cambell
Defendant:
Jimmy Hyatt, Michael Pratt, John Winter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mark Hopper v. City of Waterloo, Iowa, et al
as 23-1117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Lamont Hopper
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Waterloo, Iowa and David R. Zellhoefer
Chestnut et al v. Klund et al
as 0:2022cv02714
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lewis Chestnut, Lawrence Anthony Barnes, Charles Nguyen Thorstad and others
Defendant:
Darcy Klund, Michael Kennedy, Joseph Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Askew v. Straw et al
as 4:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
Charles Askew
Defendant:
Cheryle Askew, Lamont Straw, Keith Humphrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2020cv04217
Defendant:
Geoff Jones, George Chiang, Scott Lenger and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lamont Jackson, Donye Jackson, Eddie Mae Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackwell v. Missouri Department of Revenue
as 4:2020cv01199
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Revenue
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lamont Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
