Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jones v. Kulesa et al
as 4:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Tamala T Jones
Defendant:
Logan K Kulesa, Shawn M Jones, Jacksonville, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Humes v. White County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2020cv00479
Defendant:
Hall, Clayton Edwards, Phillip Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Humes, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00133
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. TJX Marshalls
as 4:2016cv00999
Plaintiff:
Dorothy M Jones
Defendant:
TJX Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Debora Tanner, et al v. Don Reed, et al
as 13-2865
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Debora D. Tanner, Danny C. Palmer and C.B., by and through next friend, Debora D. Tanner, and on behalf of her deceased Mother, Karen A. Palmer
Defendant:
City of Sullivan
Defendant - Appellant:
Don L. Reed, DSN 115, Darrin M. Jones, DSN 117, Kevin L. Halbert and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Tanner et al v. City of Sullivan et al
as 4:2011cv01361
Plaintiff:
Debora D. Tanner , Danny C. Palmer and C.B.
Defendant:
City of Sullivan , Don L. Reed , Darrin M. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
