Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Torre v. State of California et al
as 5:2024cv05030
Plaintiff:
Robert Carmelo Torre
Defendant:
State of California, Gavin Christopher Newsom, Rob Andres Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ostrowski v. Office of Elections et al
as 1:2020cv00209
Defendant:
Lt. Governor Spencer Cox, Secretary of State Jim Condos, Wisconsin Election Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ostrowski
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Steffens v. California, State of et al
as 4:2020cv00763
Defendant:
California, State of, Central Intelligence Agency, Nancy Pelosi and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Arthur Steffens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newsome v. Green et al
as 4:2020cv00391
Defendant:
Does Google LLC members, Facebook profile members, Marco Polo app developer, Larry Foster, Nathaniel Green and others
Plaintiff:
LaVita Newsome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00670
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Abbott v. TENT Restaurant Operations, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00884
Plaintiff:
Ashley M Abbott and Ashley M Abbott
Defendant:
TENT Restaurant Operations, Inc., Centerpoint Medical Center of Independence, LLC, City of Independence, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
