Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Casada v. Peck et al
as 6:2023cv03013
Plaintiff:
James Ray Casada
Defendant:
Harry Peck, City of Merriam Woods and Harry Peek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd v. Faughn et al
as 2:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Tylenn Jamar Todd
Defendant:
Brodie Faughn, Mark Duke, Austin Peek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kirk Nelson v. Steve Maples, et al
as 16-1592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kirk Nelson
Defendant - Appellee:
Steve Maples, Christian County Deputy Sheriff, H. Wesley Peek, Christian County Deputy Sheriff, Dr. Warford B. Johnson, II and others
Nelson v. Maples et al
as 6:2015cv03427
Plaintiff:
Kirk Nelson
Defendant:
Steve Maples, H. Wesley Peek, Warford B. Johnson, II and others
Counter_claimant:
Warford B. Johnson, II
Counter_defendant:
Kirk Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goffin v. Peek et al
as 1:2015cv01040
Plaintiff:
Davdrin Goffin
Defendant:
Randy Peek , Robbie K. Ashcraft , Bryan Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Percy Green, II v. Paul Nocciero, et al
as 11-2037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Percy Green, II
Defendant - Appellee:
Paul Nocciero, Secretary of the Board of Police Commissioners, Joseph Mokwa, Chief of the Board of Police Commissioners, Chris Goodson, Presidnet and Commissioner of the Board of Police Commissioners of the City of St. Louis, Missouri and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hale v. Warren, City of et al
as 1:2007cv01026
Plaintiff:
Barnard Hale and Barnard Hale
Defendant:
Warren, City of, Randy Peek, Bradley County, Arkansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells v. Warren, City of et al
as 1:2007cv01021
Plaintiff:
Arnold Ray Wells and Arnold Ray Wells
Defendant:
Warren, City of, Randy Peek, Bradley County, Arkansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
