Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wisdom et al v. ElShohly et al
as 2:2020cv04255
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Dr. David D Allen, Food and Drug Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Adela Dawnise Wisdom and Victoria Rose Mindiola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Trump et al
as 8:2017cv00316
Plaintiff:
DyJuan D. Barnes
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, Michael Pence, Paul Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Engel v. Trump et al
as 3:2017cv05073
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
Donald J Trump and Mike Pence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Brooks v. Hansen et al
as 4:2014cv00309
Plaintiff:
Dwight Ellis Brooks
Defendant:
Dennis Hansen , J Leon Holmes , Brian S Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Brooks v. McCord et al
as 4:2013cv00352
Plaintiff:
Dwight Ellis Brooks
Defendant:
Stacey E McCord , Daniel A Applegate , Susan Webber Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Farmers and Ranchers Cooperative Association Inc et al v. Vilsack et al
as 4:2013cv00341
Plaintiff:
Farmers and Ranchers Cooperative Association Inc and Dwight Ellis Brooks
Defendant:
Thomas J Vilsack , Kristine G Baker , Eric H Holder, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Pence et al v. City of Saint Louis, Missouri
as 4:2013cv00871
Plaintiff:
Nick Pence and Frederick Walker
Defendant:
City of Saint Louis, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v Pence et al
as 4:2012cv00290
Plaintiff:
Charles Martin
Defendant:
Adam Pence, Jeff Shipley, Keokuk County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv01371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
