Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Rankin v. Arkansas Office of Child Support Enforcement
as 3:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Kirk Jerome Rankin
Defendant:
Arkansas Office of Child Support Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
David Whitehead v. President William Clinton, et al
as 21-1671
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Howard University, New Line Cinema and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Louis Whitehead
David Whitehead v. President William Clinton, et al
as 21-1976
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Howard University, New Line Cinema and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Louis Whitehead
A.P. et al v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2020cv01547
Defendant:
Pamela Clark, Andrew Vanderusen, Amber Bass and others
Plaintiff:
Angie Pollock, A.P., G.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rankin v. Casey et al
as 4:2019cv01691
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rankin
Defendant:
Wayne Casey and City of Pevely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cynthia Brown v. Regions Bank, et al
as 12-3620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cynthia L. Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
Regions Bank, Metropolitan Bank, Centennial Bank and others
Brown v. Regions Bank et al
as 4:2012cv00593
Plaintiff:
Cynthia L Brown
Defendant:
Regions Bank, Metropolitan Bank, Centennial Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Whitehead v. President William Clinton, et al
as 11-3799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Louis Whitehead
Defendant - Appellee:
President William Jefferson Clinton, President George W. Bush, President Barack Obama and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
