Cases 1 - 10 of 231
Russell Lindquist v. Vicki Taylor, et al
as 24-1876
Plaintiff:
Russell Floyd Lindquist
Defendant:
Vicki Taylor, individually and officially as Assistant Chief Judge in Dakota County (DC), First Judicial District, Keith M. Ellison, officially as Minnesota Attorney General, Matt Smith, officially as DC Manager and others
Lindquist v. Taylor et al
as 0:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Russell Floyd Lindquist
Defendant:
Vicki Taylor, Keith Ellison, Matt Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Angela Freiner v. Mary Russell
as 24-1009
Plaintiff:
Angela M Freiner and Angela M. Freiner
Defendant:
Hon. Mary R. Russell, In Her Honors Official Capacity as Council Chair for the Judicial Council of Missouri
Marr v. Russell
as 4:2023cv01708
Plaintiff:
Brooke Marr
Defendant:
Hon. Mary R. Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crowson v. Doe et al
as 4:2023cv04112
Plaintiff:
Russell Crowson
Defendant:
John Doe, Michael Kramm and City of Texarkana, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Hutchinson
as 4:2023cv01126
Plaintiff:
Inas Ward
Defendant:
Russell Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Salem v. Russell
as 4:2023cv01317
Plaintiff:
Jane Grace Salem
Defendant:
Hon. Mary R. Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brendan Welch, et al v. Double 00 Shitshow, et al
as 23-3290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brendan Welch and Welch Racing LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
Double 00 Shitshow, Jeremy Joehrke Lehrke, Shawn Stougard and others
Freiner v. Russell
as 4:2023cv01279
Plaintiff:
Angela M Freiner
Defendant:
Hon. Mary R. Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dean v. Russell
as 4:2023cv01280
Plaintiff:
Alexandra M. Dean
Defendant:
Hon. Mary R. Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
