Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv02301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Day v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2019cv00496
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Minnesota Supreme Court, Dadri-Anne A. Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Roy A. Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Watlington et al
as 4:2018cv00289
Plaintiff:
Harvey Martin
Defendant:
Eugene Watlington, Martin Clifford, Brinton Ramoly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaysen McCleary, et al v. City of Des Moines, et al
as 17-2375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jaysen McCleary and Bela Animal Legal Defense and Rescue
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Des Moines, Scott Sanders, Jeffrey Lester and others
McCleary et al v. City of Des Moines et al
as 4:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jaysen McCleary and Bela Animal Legal Defense and Rescue
Defendant:
City of Des Moines , Scott Sanders , Jeffrey Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Westley v. Henry Bryant, et al
as 15-2713
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Westley
Defendant - Appellee:
Henry L. Bryant, Minnesota Attorney General's Office, Florida Attorney General Office and others
Powell v. Starbuck et al
as 4:2015cv00233
Plaintiff:
Daniel Franklin Powell
Defendant:
David Starbuck and Faulkner County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
