Cases 121 - 130 of 22,229
Hughes v. Richards et al
as 4:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Brian RaMon Hughes
Defendant:
Haynes, Caffey, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buford v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Stephen Louis Shermond Buford
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson and Anthony Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrell v. Does
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
William Lee Terrell
Defendant:
Does Unknown Agents, Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooney v. Knuckles
as 4:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Krishonn Tyrone Cooney
Defendant:
Brady Knuckles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rundel v. Turn Key Medical et al
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Robert Rundel
Defendant:
Turn Key Medical and Bailey Crocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. White et al
as 3:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Curtis Morris
Defendant:
Jacob White and J B Hoyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Russell v. Fowler et al
as 4:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Derrick Russell
Defendant:
Lea Ellen Fowler, Ola B Lackey, Eric S Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Warner et al
as 4:2024cv04045
Plaintiff:
Aaron Hill
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Otto Warner and Correctional Officer Paige Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Warner et al
as 4:2024cv04049
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Leon Roberts
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Otto Warner and Correctional Officer Paige Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nielsen v. Warner et al
as 4:2024cv04044
Plaintiff:
Howard Dale Nielsen
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Otto Warner and Correctional Officer Paige Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
