Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Bullock v. Miller et al
as 4:2020cv00238
Defendant:
Sean Crawford, Helen Miller, Beth Skinner and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Plaintiff:
Daunte Bullock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polk v. Arkansas Board of Parole et al
as 4:2019cv00652
Defendant:
Dawne B Vandiver, Andy Shock, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Lee Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waller v. Kelley
as 4:2019cv00312
Defendant:
M Graydon, Jerry Riley, D Shields and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L Waller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv03100
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Blodgett v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2018cv00080
Plaintiff:
Ricky Joe Blodgett
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, Adam Gregg, Jerry Bartruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Jacob v. Rosalyn Cotton, et al
as 17-3469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David H. Jacob
Defendant - Appellee:
Rosalyn Cotton, Chairperson of the Nebraska Board of Parole, Rex Richard, Member of the Nebraska Board of Parole, Randall L. Rehmeier, Member of the Nebraska Board of Parole and others
Haire v. Iowa Board of Parole et al
as 4:2017cv00368
Plaintiff:
Michael Haire
Defendant:
Iowa Board of Parole, Cleo Hester, Steven Scholl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sabata et al v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
as 4:2017cv03107
Plaintiff:
Dylan Cardeilhac, James Curtright, Jason Galle and others
Defendant:
Harbans Deol, Does, Scott Frakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bullock v. Hodges et al
as 4:2017cv00192
Plaintiff:
Daunte Bullock
Defendant:
John Hodges, Iowa Board of Parole, Jerry Bartruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Kelley et al
as 5:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
Matthew W Barnett
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley and Arkansas Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
