Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Ellis v. Ludlum et al
as 5:2016cv00157
Plaintiff:
Jerry J Ellis
Defendant:
S Ludlum, J Stieve, B Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Kelly et al
as 5:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Carl Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly, Rory Griffen, Amanda King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. King et al
as 5:2015cv00320
Plaintiff:
Michael Perry Muhammad
Defendant:
A King, Snow, Chisom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckner v. Clowers et al
as 5:2015cv00088
Plaintiff:
Roger Buckner
Defendant:
W Clowers, V Scroggins, Amanda Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale Bryant v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 14-1478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dale E. Bryant
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Wendy Kelley, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Nwannem Obi-Okoye, Dr., Diagnostic Unit, ADC and others
Mason v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv06110
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc., Wanetta Clowers, Aric Simmons and others
Plaintiff:
James Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glass v. Langston et al
as 3:2013cv00158
Plaintiff:
Christopher Douglas Glass
Defendant:
Shannon Langston, Chris Jester, Rebecca Clowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dale Bryant v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 12-3171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dale E. Bryant
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Wendy Kelley, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and Michael Person, Dr., Arkansas Department of Correction
Defendant:
Obi, Dr., Diagnostic Unit, ADC, Clyde, Dr., Diagnostic Unit, ADC, - Simmons, Mr., Nurse, Ouachita Regional Unit, ADC and others
Bryant v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Dale Bryant
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Wendy Kelley, Obi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
