Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Perkins v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays and Larry Perkins
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John P Yates, Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John P Yates, Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. USA
as 0:2022cv02268
Petitioner:
Otis Ray Mays, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mays v. USA
as 0:2022cv01932
Petitioner:
Otis Ray Mays, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Michael Robertson v. Rodiguez, et al
as 22-2543
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Otis Robertson
Defendant / Appellee:
Rodiguez, Deputy, Pulaski County Detention Facility and Eric Higgins, Sheriff, Pulaski County
Robertson v. Harrison et al
as 4:2022cv00619
Plaintiff:
Michael Otis Robertson
Defendant:
T Harrison, Joseph Austin, Eric S Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Rodiguez et al
as 4:2022cv00608
Plaintiff:
Michael Otis Robertson
Defendant:
Rodiguez and Eric S Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Robertson v. Rodiguez, et al
as 22-2084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Otis Robertson
Defendant / Appellee:
Rodiguez, Deputy, Pulaski County Detention Facility and Eric Higgins, Sheriff, Pulaski County
Otis v. Clark et al
as 4:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Christopher Otis
Defendant:
Clark, Hill, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. USA
as 0:2022cv01295
Petitioner:
Otis Ray Mays, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
