Cases 11 - 20 of 4,887
Carter v. Huhn
as 4:2024cv00630
Petitioner:
William Billy G. Carter
Respondent:
Valerie Huhn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Conrad v. United States
as 24-1933
Petitioner:
William Desmond Conrad
Respondent:
United States of America
Scott v. Gibson et al
as 4:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
James Gibson, Shipman, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunahue v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dunahue
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Dexter Payne, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Fritel
as 0:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Roberto A. Williams
Defendant:
Mark Fritel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reo Covington v. William Chronister, et al
as 24-1906
Plaintiff:
Reo L. Covington
Defendant:
William Chronister, Dardenelle Police Officer, Does, 1-4, Dardenelle Police Officers, Pearson's Towing & Recovery Services LLC, Towing Services and others
Childers v. Does et al
as 4:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Childers
Defendant:
Does Employed by Arkansas Division of Correction, Benny Magness, John Felts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Does
as 4:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Does Employed by Arkansas Division of Correction, Benny Magness, John Felts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cohns v. Mixon et al
as 4:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Rodric D Cohns
Defendant:
Quintin Mixon, Curry Branham, William Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry Williams v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-1455
Plaintiff:
Henry Williams
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, ADC, Gary Musselwhite, Warden, Cummins Unit, Robert L. Pierce, Security Deputy Warden, Cummins Unit and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
