Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 201 - 210 of 73,846
Muhammad v. United States of America Federal Government Official Officer, Agents et al
as 8:2024cv00159
Plaintiff: Kariem Qaadir Muhammad
Defendant: United States of America Federal Government Official Officer, Agents, The City of Denver and The City of Aurora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoulders v. Hardy et al
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff: Roderick Davontae Shoulders
Defendant: Hardy, Harmon, Musselwhite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04022
Petitioner: Travis Cain Lewis
Respondent: State of Arkansas and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willingham v. Dobbs et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff: Christopher Willingham
Defendant: James Dobbs, Barbra Strom and Everrte Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Conrad v. United States
as 24-1933
Petitioner: William Desmond Conrad
Respondent: United States of America
Bernard Manuel v. United States
as 24-1938
Other: Bernard Manuel
Respondent: United States of America
Ryan Haynes v. United States
as 24-1939
Petitioner: Ryan Nicholas Haynes
Respondent: United States of America
Salvador Murillo v. Muscatine County Jail
as 24-1936
Plaintiff: Salvador Manjarrez Murillo
Defendant: Muscatine County Jail
Russell Larson v. Buchanan County Jail, et al
as 24-1485
Plaintiff: Russell A. Larson
Defendant: Buchanan County Jail, Scott Buzynski, Mike Rothford and others
Warfield v. South Dakota Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv04049
Plaintiff: Kelly Warfield
Defendant: South Dakota Department of Corrections and State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?