Cases 211 - 220 of 74,025
Ellis v. Does
as 4:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Corey L Ellis
Defendant:
Does Mark/Scott, Owners, Loose Change Coin Laundry; Ty, Loose Change Coin Laundry; Employee, Loose Change Coin Laundry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Poinsett County Jail
as 3:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Jacob Kyle Campbell
Defendant:
Poinsett County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Poinsett County Jail
as 3:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Larry Alvin Brown
Defendant:
Poinsett County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott v. State of Missouri
as 4:2024cv00357
Petitioner:
Stephen Lee Elliott
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keen v. Cook et al
as 6:2024cv03086
Plaintiff:
CeCil Keen
Defendant:
Darin Cook and DeWitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ladenburger v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2024cv04059
Petitioner:
Robert Reilly Ladenburger
Respondent:
State of South Dakota and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marion Chapman v. Clay Stanton, et al
as 24-2047
Plaintiff:
Marion M. Chapman
Defendant:
Clay Stanton, Warden, Jalilah Otto, Judge and Theresa Crayon
Lawrence Swift v. Does, et al
as 24-2048
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Swift
Defendant:
Does, Natallia Carpenter, Correctional Officer, ADC and Shanda Glover, Nurse
Harris v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00097
Petitioner:
Dartanyus C. Harris
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Otoniel Gomez
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Com. Jennifer Clemons-Abdullah, Dep Com. Unknown Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
