Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Morton v. Castillo et al
as 6:2011cv03385
Petitioner:
Shelton Morton
Respondent:
Juan D. Castillo , United States Government , Paul Celestin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Escobar v. Holder et al
as 0:2009cv03717
Petitioner:
Arturo Bahena Escobar
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Janet Napolitano, John Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parker v. Hentges et al
as 4:2009cv00443
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Parker
Defendant:
Kathy Hentges, William Newhouse, L. Borkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyshay Morton v. Dr. Frank Filippelli
as 09-1919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tyshay B. Morton
Defendant - Appellee:
Dr. Frank Filippelli
Morton v. Newton Correctional Facility, et al.,
as 4:2008cv00510
Plaintiff:
Tyshay B. Morton
Defendant:
Newton Correctional Facility and Sparks
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clark v. County of McLean et al
as 1:2008cv00075
Plaintiff:
Larry Dwain Clark
Defendant:
County of McLean, Don Charging, Dave Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morton v. Newton Correctional Facility, et al.,
as 4:2008cv00444
Plaintiff:
Tyshay B. Morton and Alisha Gonzalez
Defendant:
Newton Correctional Facility and Newton Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mize et al v. Crawford et al
as 2:2008cv04063
Plaintiff:
Eric Mize, Shaheed Muslin Habeebullah and Rodney Robinson
Defendant:
Larry Crawford, Steve Long, Mike Kemna and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Garcia v. Morton et al
as 5:2008cv05046
Plaintiff:
Margarita Garcia
Defendant:
George B. Morton, State of Arkansas, Xollie Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Dr Fillipelli
as 4:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
Tyshay B. Morton
Defendant:
Fillipelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
