Cases 31 - 40 of 1,040
Pollard-El Jr. v. Allen et al
as 4:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Byron Pollard-El Jr.
Defendant:
Richard Adam Allen and Unknown Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Grady v. Brent Fluke, et al
as 24-1094
Petitioner:
Adam Owen Grady
Respondent:
Warden Brent Fluke and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Dorsey v. Foley et al
as 4:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Brian Dorsey and Brian J. Dorsey
Defendant:
Trevor S. Foley, Myles Strid, Richard Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Cotten et al
as 4:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Jerome Edward Washington
Defendant:
David P Cotten, Jason Mitchell, Jeffie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Happy Stompingbear v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 24-1011
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear, also known as Chris Ward
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, former Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director, ADC, Marvin Evans and others
Adams v. USA
as 2:2024cv04003
Petitioner:
Shunta Lamont Adams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Adams v. Randoulph et al
as 4:2023cv01704
Plaintiff:
Marquise Adams
Defendant:
Unknown Randoulph and Unknown Wilborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Beverage et al
as 4:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Cody L. Smith
Defendant:
Steve Beverage, Sr., Kelsey Speed, Angla Kolker and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Beverage et al
as 5:2024cv04006
Plaintiff:
Cody L Smith
Defendant:
Steve Beverage, Sr, Kelsey Speed, Angla Kolker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Shallon Hawkins
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
