Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Bowles v. Dooley et al
as 5:2013cv05039
Petitioner:
Wade Elliot Bowles
Respondent:
Warden Dooley, Douglas Weber and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eubanks v. Acosta et al
as 5:2011cv05049
Plaintiff:
Willis Dode Eubanks
Defendant:
Elliot Acosta , Michael McCranie , Jared Gully and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
Andrew Johnson
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Sheryl Lockwood, Dan Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bass v. Lanoue et al
as 4:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Mack Bass
Defendant:
Michael Lanoue, John Doe, John Guthrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bass v. Lanoue
as 4:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
Mack Bass
Defendant:
Michael Lanoue , John Doe, John Guthrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beckman v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2010cv00575
Plaintiff:
Bobby Neil Beckman
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Michael Savala, Nick Ludwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United States of America
as 5:2010cv05044
Petitioner:
Jason Elliot Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pierson v. Minneapolis Police Department et al
as 0:2010cv01960
Plaintiff:
Elliot Lamar-Seccer Pierson
Defendant:
Minneapolis Police Department, Metro Transit Police Department, City of Minneapolis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Ward v. Duke Terrell
as 09-1609
Petitioner - Appellant:
James Elliot Ward
Respondent - Appellee:
Duke Terrell, Warden
Robert Hillard v. Harold Clarke, et al
as 08-1790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Stacey Hillard
Defendant - Appellee:
Harold Clarke, Director, Nebraska Department of Corrections, to be sued in official capacity, C. W. Chase, Officer, Caseworker to be sued in their individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
