Cases 31 - 40 of 321
Shaun Allen v. State of Arkansas, et al
as 22-2069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shaun C. Allen
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Arkansas, City of Conway, Reynolds, Magistrate Judge, Conway District Court and others
Vanderford v. Schnell et al
as 0:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
Zhi Kai H. Vanderford
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Michelle L. Smith, Kathryn Halvorson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Wasko et al
as 4:2022cv04054
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Shaw
Defendant:
Kelly Wasko, Dan Sullivan, Brent Fluke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Kurtenbach v. Hughes County, et al
as 22-1487
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew C. Kurtenbach
Defendant / Appellee:
Hughes County and Reliance Telephone Services
Allen v. Helder et al
as 5:2022cv05016
Plaintiff:
Joe M. Allen
Defendant:
Sheriff Tim Helder, Prosecutor Matt Durrett, Prosecutor Dennis Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spotted Elk v. Young et al
as 4:2022cv04031
Defendant:
Jessica Cook, Jeannie Bertch, Darrin Young and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Gregory Spotted Elk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2021cv01152
Plaintiff:
Shaun C Allen
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Conway, City of, Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Birkholz et al
as 0:2021cv02017
Petitioner:
Anthony Johnson and Darnell Hughes
Respondent:
B. Birkholz and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garner v. Precythe et al
as 5:2021cv06098
Plaintiff:
Frank Garner
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Brenda Fletchall, Ms. Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flemming v. Holloman-Hughes et al
as 4:2021cv00664
Plaintiff:
Antonio Flemming
Defendant:
Ronna Holloman-Hughes, Laine Cardarella, Mark Wolpink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
