Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Monk v. Rankin et al
as 1:2011cv01063
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
David Rankin, Roger Giles, Donna Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solomon v. The United States Marshal Service et al
as 5:2010cv05163
Plaintiff:
James Clayton Solomon
Defendant:
The United States Marshal Service, Hunter Petray, Keith Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin v. Black Hawk County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2010cv02021
Plaintiff:
Max Rankin
Defendant:
Black Hawk County Sheriff's Office, Unknown Police Station, Unknown Officer 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin v. Tingle et al
as 4:2009cv00372
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rankin
Defendant:
Brian Tingle and Kevin Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rankin v. Tingle et al
as 1:2009cv00135
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rankin
Defendant:
Brian Tingle and Kevin Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Roderick Rankin v. Larry Norris
as 09-2858
Petitioner - Appellee:
Roderick Leshun Rankin
Respondent - Appellant:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Timothy Rankins v. Crawford County Jail, et al
as 09-2446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy Duane Rankins
Defendant - Appellee:
Crawford County Jail, Phelps County Sheriff's Department, John Doe, #1 through #4 and others
Rankins v. Crawford County Jail et al
as 4:2009cv00838
Plaintiff:
Timothy Duane Rankins
Defendant:
Crawford County Jail, Phelps County Sheriff's Department, John Doe #1 through #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Ferguson et al
as 5:2009cv05053
Plaintiff:
Mark D Weaver
Defendant:
Keith - Ferguson, Hunter Petray, Carlton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Weaver v. Johnson et al
as 5:2008cv05186
Plaintiff:
Mark D Weaver
Defendant:
Deputy Johnson, Carlton, Hunter Petray and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
