Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Hutchinson v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
Chad Hutchinson
Defendant:
T C Outlaw, United States Bureau of Prisons, Harold Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Woods v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2009cv00014
Plaintiff:
Sammie Woods
Defendant:
T C Outlaw, United States Bureau of Prisons, Harold Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Barber v. USA et al
as 2:2009cv00009
Plaintiff:
Brent M Barber
Defendant:
USA, United States Bureau of Prisons, Outlaw and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Reichenbach v. Outlaw et al
as 4:2008cv04186
Plaintiff:
Boyd S Reichenbach, III
Defendant:
T C Outlaw and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lagerstrom v. Matos et al
as 2:2008cv00189
Plaintiff:
Gary Dean Lagerstrom
Defendant:
Hipolito Matos, N Shah, United States Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Quinones v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2008cv00105
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Quinones
Defendant:
T C Outlaw, United States Bureau of Prisons and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lewis v. Department of Justice et al
as 2:2008cv00059
Plaintiff:
Damiene Lewis
Defendant:
Department of Justice, United States Bureau of Prisons and Azuma
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Morgan v. Fondren et al
as 0:2008cv00491
Petitioner:
Terry Leroy Morgan
Respondent:
Dwight Fondren, Gary Moore, Community Corrections Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Charles Swarzentruber v. C. Holinka, et al
as 07-3764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Swarzentruber
Defendant - Appellee:
C. Holinka, Warden, FCI Waseca and United States Bureau of Prisons
Checo v. US Department of Justice et al
as 0:2007cv03698
Plaintiff:
Miguel Checo
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, United States Bureau of Prisons and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.