Cases 31 - 40 of 73,846
William Hill v. United States
as 24-2023
Petitioner:
William Thomas Hill
Respondent:
United States of America
Marqus Patton v. Taggart Boyd, et al
as 24-2026
Plaintiff:
Marqus Patton
Defendant:
Taggart Boyd, Warden of the Reception and Treatment Center, Michael Hilgers, Nebraska Attorney General and Rob Jeffreys, Director of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Rickie Tigue, Jr. v. Moses Jackson, et al
as 24-2029
Plaintiff:
Rickie Lynn Tigue, Jr.
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Warden, EARU, Brickey's Max, Johnson, Warden, EARU, Brickey's Max, Allison, Major, EARU, Brickey's Max and others
Stovall v. Henry
as 6:2024cv06035
Plaintiff:
Vandy D. Stovall and Black
Defendant:
Dr Guy Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spann v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Jihad Ahmad Spann
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Nebraska Superior Court
as 8:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Tyriece Washington
Respondent:
Nebraska Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bynum v. Woods
as 4:2024cv00688
Petitioner:
Darryl R. Bynum
Respondent:
Ryan Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Red Lake band of Chippewa et al
as 0:2024cv01797
Petitioner:
Santee Howard
Respondent:
Red Lake band of Chippewa and Red Lake tribal Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sayers v. Redlake Band of chippewa et al
as 0:2024cv01799
Petitioner:
Dezmyn Sayers
Respondent:
Redlake Band of chippewa and Redlake nation courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barton v. Boyd et al
as 8:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
James Barton
Defendant:
Taggart Boyd, Michele Wilholm, Case Manager Hassan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
