Cases 51 - 60 of 77
Kennedy v. Terrell
as 0:2009cv01043
Petitioner:
Kevin J. Kennedy
Defendant:
Duke Terrell and Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
James Ward v. Duke Terrell
as 09-1609
Petitioner - Appellant:
James Elliot Ward
Respondent - Appellee:
Duke Terrell, Warden
Zavala v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2009cv03047
Plaintiff:
Francisco Zavala
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Marty Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Akbar v. U.S. Federal Government et al
as 0:2009cv00121
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Akbar
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Government, Mary Haugen, Brenda Mort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevenson v. Terrell
as 0:2008cv06058
Petitioner:
Reginald Stevenson
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Slupkowski v. United States of America et al
as 8:2008cv00471
Petitioner:
Stanley A. Slupkowski
Respondent:
United States of America and Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Stanley Slupkowski v. United States, et al
as 08-2742
Petitioner - Appellant:
Stanley A. Slupkowski
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America and Duke Terrell, Warden, FMC Rochester, MN
Francis v. Terrell et al
as 0:2008cv02186
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lynn Francis
Respondent:
Duke Terrell and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cooke v. Stanton et al
as 0:2008cv01175
Plaintiff:
Randle Cooke
Defendant:
Shelly Stanton, Nancy Schwend and Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slupkowski v. Terrell et al
as 0:2008cv01081
Plaintiff:
Stanley A. Slupkowski
Defendant:
Duke Terrell and P Seebach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
