Cases 61 - 70 of 2,416
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkins v. Staten et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Michael Justin Parkins
Defendant:
Deigarion M Staten, Scott Taylor, Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ekman v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00449
Petitioner:
David Scott Ekman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. Frakes et al
as 4:2023cv03214
Plaintiff:
Antwon L. Williams
Defendant:
Scott Frakes, Jeff Kasselman, Dr. Robert Cunard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurr v. Weber
as 4:2023cv00826
Petitioner:
Jakob Hurr
Respondent:
Scott Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carter v. Frakes et al
as 8:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Paige Carter
Defendant:
Scott Frakes, Michele Wilhelm and John/Jane Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry Lee v. Kevin Patterson, et al
as 23-3420
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terry Antonio Lee
Defendant / Appellee:
Kevin Patterson, Lt., Tucker Max, Mariquse McCan, Sgt., Tucker Max, Cierra Washington, Sgt. and others
Scott v. Karas et al
as 5:2023cv05188
Plaintiff:
Brandon Scott
Defendant:
Dr. Robert Karas, Earl Hinely and Tim Helder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Childers et al
as 4:2023cv00772
Plaintiff:
Shane Hill
Defendant:
Scott Childers and Ray County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
Kevin L Hamilton, Jr
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Lattimore, Mussadic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
