Cases 71 - 80 of 172
Malone v. United States Parole Commission
as 4:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Herbert Phillip Malone
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Keith Blackwell v. Charlie Dooley, et al
as 16-4470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith Lamar Blackwell
Defendant - Appellee:
Charlie A. Dooley, County Executive, Garry W. Earls, Chief Operating Officer, Herbert Bernsen, Director, St. Louis County Justice Center and others
Coleman v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00605
Petitioner:
Herbert Coleman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Speller v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00320
Petitioner:
Herbert O. Speller
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cunningham v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00100
Petitioner:
Herbert O'Shay Cunningham
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thornton v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00241
Petitioner:
Herbert Thornton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Larry Flynt v. George Lombardi, et al
as 16-2232
Intervenor - Appellant:
Larry C. Flynt
Plaintiff:
Earl Ringo, John C. Middleton, Russell Bucklew and others
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, Terry Russell and John Doe
Joseph Anthony Favors v. Michelle Hoover, et al
as 16-1888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Defendant - Appellee:
Michelle Hoover, Lucinda Jesson, Daniel Storkamp and others
Scott v. Handy et al
as 4:2016cv00189
Plaintiff:
John Scott
Defendant:
Patrick Handy, Melinda Perkins, Heinleg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Flynt v. George Lombardi, et al
as 16-1295
Intervenor - Appellant:
Larry C. Flynt
Plaintiff:
Earl Ringo, John C. Middleton, Russell Bucklew and others
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, Terry Russell and John Doe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
