Cases 81 - 90 of 4,872
Titus v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. John Doe Staff Member
as 5:2024cv05052
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
John Doe Staff Member
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
William Mayfield
Defendant:
Doe and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slater et al v. Buckner et al
as 6:2024cv03064
Plaintiff:
Joshua R Slater and Jermaine McDaniels
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, Heath Cantrell, Smith Billy William and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Randle et al
as 4:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Ellis
Defendant:
Kenyon Randle and Does Lieutenant, E.A.R.U. Max; Mental Health Doctor, Central Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Tallant et al
as 4:2024cv04020
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Dale Smith, Jr and Curtis Wayne Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Jana Tallant, John or Jane Doe Administrative Staff, Jailer Landon Tollette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinonez Venegas v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Sergio Ivan Quinonez Venegas
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Garner v. Doe-1 et al
as 4:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Oscar Garner
Defendant:
John Doe-1, John Doe-2, John Doe-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Junkins v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Joshua Luke Junkins
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Belts, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donley v. Turn Key Medical Service
as 4:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Carl Mickles Donley, III
Defendant:
Turn Key Medical Service, Barnes, Erwan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
