Cases 1 - 10 of 605
Curry v. Mesmer et al
as 2:2024cv00064
Defendant:
Larry Hale, Lance McAfee, Joey Runyon and others
Plaintiff:
Brittany S. Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whirl Wind Horse v. Lincoln County et al
as 4:2024cv04148
Defendant:
Alex Reyes, TeAndre Archambeau, Cory Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Whirl Wind Horse, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Wallace v. Nelson et al
as 4:2024cv00685
Defendant:
S Nelson, D Craig, S Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamont Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
Raymond Perry
Defendant:
Nelson, Eric Higgins and Barry Hyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. White et al
as 6:2024cv06107
Defendant:
Warden Walt White, Sergeant Ian Thomas, Lieutenant Standford and others
Plaintiff:
Evis Dan Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. White et al
as 6:2024cv06106
Defendant:
Lieutenant Kennedy, Sergeant Ian Thomas, Warden Walt White and others
Plaintiff:
Evis Dan Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00617
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Nelson and Barry Hyde
Plaintiff:
Branden J Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wert v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00618
Defendant:
Barry Hyde, Eric Higgins and Nelson
Plaintiff:
Joshua Wert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00619
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Nelson and Barry Hyde
Plaintiff:
Javeon Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Gray
Defendant:
Barry Hyde, Nelson and Eric Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
