Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant:
Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others
Titus v Scarface et al
as 4:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Scarface, Al Pacino, Keef Coff Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tennin v. Torres et al
as 0:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Todd Tennin
Defendant:
Torres, Dan Minke, Jessica Fergen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown'el v. White County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Dion Brown'el
Defendant:
White County Sheriff's Department, White County Sheriff's Office, White County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meraz v. Doe Dispatch Officer et al
as 5:2024cv05029
Plaintiff:
Jerome M. Meraz
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe Dispatch Officer, Patrol Officer Z. Tallon and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick Smith v. Guy Bosch, Warden
as 23-3282
Petitioner / Appellant:
Derrick Z. Smith
Respondent / Appellee:
Guy Bosch, Warden MCF-STW
Gallardo v. Lemmons et al
as 4:2023cv00468
Plaintiff:
Jackie D Gallardo
Defendant:
Z Lemmons and Does Turnkey Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chism v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
Nathan Harold Chism
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshal Dale Reed, Jennifer Carl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dailing v. Morriss
as 6:2022cv03200
Petitioner:
Eric Z Dailing
Respondent:
Kelly Morriss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
