Cases 1 - 10 of 319
Dansby v. Warner et al
as 4:2024cv04046
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alexander Dansby
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Otto Warner and Correctional Officer Paige Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. WC Dub Brassel Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Gordon Dean Pickens, Jr
Defendant:
WC Dub Brassel Detention Center, Lincoln County Detention Center, Steve Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dansby v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04032
Petitioner:
Joseph Alexander Dansby, Sr
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Kew v. Linn County Correctional Center et al
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Alexander Jordan Kew
Defendant:
Linn County Correctional Center, State Public Defenders Office, Cedar Rapids, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Dunklin County et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
J. W. Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Dunklin County, State of Missouri, Steven Geary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Alexander Youth Services Center
as 4:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
DeMarian Tyrell Ford
Defendant:
Alexander Youth Services Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Alexander Youth Services Center
as 5:2024cv05041
Plaintiff:
DeMarian Tyrell Ford
Defendant:
Alexander Youth Services Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miyo Alexander v. State of Minnesota
as 24-1145
Petitioner:
Miyo M. Alexander
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Holovich v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
Alexander James Holovich
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. USA
as 6:2023cv03393
Petitioner:
Alexander Monday Coleman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
