Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Price v. Burke
as 0:2024cv01409
Plaintiff:
Paul Vincent Price
Defendant:
George J. Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrone Allen v. Randy Philhours, et al
as 23-3497
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tyrone Allen
Defendant / Appellee:
Randy F. Philhours, Judge, Crittenden County, Mike Snell, Prosecuting Attorney, Crittenden County and Addie Burk, Public Defender
Damon Porter v. United States
as 23-3171
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Damon Dewayne Porter
Defendant:
DeWayne Hendrix, Warden, FCC Medium, Ron White, Safety, FCC Medium, M. Paggant, Safety, FCC Medium and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America
Allen v. Philhours et al
as 2:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Allen
Defendant:
Randy Philhours, Mike Snell and Addie Burk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burks v. Lewis et al
as 4:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Terrence Burks, Cobbs, Newburn and others
Defendant:
Lewis, Donzell Lewis, Matthew Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Paul Antonio Burke, Jr
Defendant:
John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Calvin Burke v. St. Louis County Jail, et al
as 22-2261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Calvin Burke
Defendant / Appellee:
St. Louis County Jail, Sam Page, Scott Anders and others
Burke v. St. Louis County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Calvin Burke
Defendant:
St. Louis County Jail, Sam Page, Scott Anders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
