Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Owens v. Samuel et al
as 5:2024cv05045
Plaintiff:
Tommy Owens
Defendant:
Major Randall Denzer, Greg Tabor, Major Greg Tabor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Weber et al
as 6:2023cv02078
Plaintiff:
Jason Joseph Wilson
Defendant:
Connor Weber, Chase Hershey, Enes Mrzljak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Weber et al
as 4:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Jason Joseph Wilson
Defendant:
Connor Weber, Chase Hershey, Enes Mrzljak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathan Chase v. Dan Sullivan, et al
as 23-3007
Petitioner / Appellant:
Nathan Chase
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden Dan Sullivan, South Dakota State Penitentiary and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Neill v. Clerk of the Court, WDMO
as 4:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Chase Neill
Defendant:
Clerk of the Court, WDMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Henry Chase Alone v. United States
as 23-2375
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Henry Chase Alone
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Chase v. Falkenrath
as 4:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Howard K Chase
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wolgamott v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv04012
Plaintiff:
Chase E Wolgamott
Defendant:
Daisy Smith, Karen Ghromley and Correctional Officer Cameron Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolgamott v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Chase E Wolgamott
Defendant:
Daisy Smith, Karen Ghromley and Cameron Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eugene Jones v. Doc Holliday, et al
as 23-1094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eugene Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
Doc Holliday, Sheriff, Pulaski County, Lemons, Officer/Deputy, James Stricklin, Officer/Deputy and others
Defendant:
Pulaski County Jail
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
