Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Mendoza v. Ross et al
as 4:2024cv04054
Plaintiff:
Santos Gerardo Mendoza and Santos Gerardo Mendoza Castellon
Defendant:
Lieutenant Ross, Jailer McMores, Sergeant Heartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dale v. Stephens et al
as 2:2024cv02053
Plaintiff:
Jason Dale
Defendant:
Former Sheriff Jimmy Stephens, Sheriff Tom Hughes, Jail Administrator Jacob Schook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elder v. Shook et al
as 2:2024cv02013
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bennett Elder
Defendant:
Captain Jacob Shook, Sergeant Justice Cato, Sergeant John Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cato v. West et al
as 4:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Shamir Cato
Defendant:
Shane West, Mike Smith and Darrell Elkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cato v. Ramey
as 4:2020cv00629
Respondent:
Eileen Ramey
Petitioner:
Ralph H. Cato, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ransom v. Weaver et al
as 4:2018cv00916
Defendant:
Charles E Clawson, Danny Raspun, Lynn Plemmons and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley V Ransom, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Cape Girardeau, County of et al
as 1:2018cv00152
Plaintiff:
Keith Taylor Brooks
Defendant:
Cape Girardeau, County of, John Jordan, Unknown Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Overbey v. Boliva et al
as 1:2018cv00150
Plaintiff:
Corey Overbey
Defendant:
Anthony Boliva, Unknown Davis, Todd Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Motton v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2017cv00708
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Rivera, Maze and others
Plaintiff:
Charles William Motton, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendoza v. Godbolt et al
as 4:2017cv04001
Plaintiff:
Santos Mendoza
Defendant:
Captain Godbolt , Jailer McMores , Sergeant Heartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
