Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cook v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00047
Plaintiff:
Nicholes D Cook
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Anne L. Precythe, Thomas Peeper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv04128
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Ryan Crews, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholes D Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Payne et al
as 4:2020cv01126
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Connie D Cook, Tina Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Gibbs
as 4:2020cv00104
Petitioner:
Gene D. Cook, Jr.
Respondent:
Randy Gibbs
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lonix v. Nunag et al
as 4:2020cv00179
Defendant:
Connie D Cook, Doe, Nunag and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Ashton Lonix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Norman et al
as 6:2019cv03140
Defendant:
Jeff Norman, Koon, Justin Brock and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholes D Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall McArty v. William Straughn, et al
as 15-2259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Randall Thomas McArty
Defendant:
State of Arkansas, Arkansas Department of Correction, Katina Owens, Corporal, ADC, Tucker Max and others
Defendant - Appellee:
William Straughn, Mr., Warden, ADC, Tucker Max, Steve Outlaw, Mr., Assistant Warden, ADC, Tucker Max, Williams, Mr., Building Major, ADC, Tucker Max and others
McArty v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 5:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
Randall T McArty
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Arkansas Department of Correction, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. State of Illinois
as 4:2010cv02065
Plaintiff:
Alain D. Cook
Defendant:
State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bell, Jr. v. Paula Phillips, et al
as 09-3657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Bell, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Paula Phillips, Troy Steele, Omar Clark and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
