Cases 1 - 10 of 333
Paschel v. Martin et al
as 4:2024cv04034
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paschel
Defendant:
Sheriff Leroy Martin, Jail Administrator Gean Sieger and Chief Deputy Jerry Maness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Korneman
as 4:2024cv00329
Petitioner:
Melvin Leroy Tyler
Respondent:
Sherie L. Korneman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christine v. Jenny Mehann et al
as 5:2023cv06158
Plaintiff:
Earl Christine
Defendant:
Jenny Mehann, Corizon Medical, Centurion Medical and others
Interested Party:
Melvin Leroy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Sieger et al
as 1:2023cv01095
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Gentry
Defendant:
Gean Sieger, Tommy Rogers, Leroy Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Sieger et al
as 4:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Gentry
Defendant:
Gean Sieger, Tommy Rogers, Leroy Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Cogvill et al
as 1:2023cv01092
Plaintiff:
James Adam Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
Sergeant Cogbill, Gean Sieger, Leroy Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Cogbill et al
as 4:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
James Adam Wright, Jr
Defendant:
Cogbill, Gean Sieger, Leroy Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathan Hicks v. Shawn Pettigrew
as 23-3065
Petitioner / Appellant:
Nathan Leroy Hicks
Respondent / Appellee:
Shawn Pettigrew, AW
Hicks v. Department of Correction et al
as 2:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Nathan Leroy Hicks
Defendant:
Department of Correction and C.O. on Duty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booker v. Singleton et al
as 4:2023cv04084
Plaintiff:
Leroy Edwin Booker, Jr
Defendant:
Chief Kimberly Tomlin, Detective Casey Singleton, Detective Eric Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
