Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jones v. Dallas County, Iowa et al
as 4:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Michael Jones and Jeffrey Jones
Defendant:
Chad Leonard, Adam Infante, Kenneth Hunziker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Payne
as 5:2020cv05109
Respondent:
State of Arkansas and Dexter Payne
Petitioner:
Dustin Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. USA
as 4:2018cv00215
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. City of Rogers, Arkansas
as 5:2017cv05111
Plaintiff:
Dustin Michael Jones
Defendant:
City of Rogers, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. State of North Dakota et al
as 3:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Jones
Defendant:
State of North Dakota, R. Benson, Warden Pringle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. John Doe Officer of the City of Rogers, Arkansas et al
as 5:2016cv05299
Plaintiff:
Dustin Michael Jones
Defendant:
John Doe Officer of the City of Rogers, Arkansas and Benton County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. St. Francois County Jail et al
as 4:2014cv01973
Plaintiff:
Larry Wayne Stewart
Defendant:
St. Francois County Jail, Gary Branham, Michael Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington et al v. Denney et al
as 5:2012cv06039
Plaintiff:
Ecclesiastical Denzel Washington
Defendant:
Larry Denney, Jay Nixon, Chris Koster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Jones v. Tom Roy, et al
as 11-2517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Tom Roy, Commissioner of Department of Corrections and Joan Fabian, Former Commissioner of Corrections, sued in their individual and official capacities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
