Cases 1 - 10 of 208
James Rutledge v. United States
as 24-2083
Plaintiff:
James Rutledge
Respondent:
United States of America
Ames v. Rutledge
as 5:2023cv05172
Plaintiff:
Donald Lesley Ames, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Holloway, Megan Rutledge and Sheriff Shawn Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ames v. Sharp
as 5:2023cv05167
Plaintiff:
Donald Lesley Ames, Jr.
Defendant:
Former Officer James Sharp, Sheriff Shawn Holloway, Parole Officer Emily Ennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Rutledge
as 5:2023cv05160
Plaintiff:
Chaston Trace Wallace
Defendant:
Benton County Detention Center and Jail Administrator Megan Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finch v. Hollingsworth et al
as 4:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Elliott Finch, Jr
Defendant:
Terri Hollingsworth, Eric Higgins, Leslie Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutledge v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv03018
Plaintiff:
James P. Rutledge
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lambert v. Whitehead et al
as 5:2023cv05088
Plaintiff:
Jericho Buchannon Lambert
Defendant:
Deputy Whitehead, Lieutenant G. Hobbleman and Jail Administrator M. Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deckard v. Rutledge, et al
as 5:2023cv05028
Plaintiff:
Frankie Doyle Deckard, Jr.
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe Staff Members, Deputy Megan Rutledge, Lieutenant Tyler Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Rutledge
as 4:2022cv01074
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
