Cases 1 - 10 of 658
Fairchild v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Joseph Levell Fairchild
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04052
Petitioner:
Shatina Ann Logan
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamner v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamner
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Arkansas Department of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Dansby v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04032
Petitioner:
Joseph Alexander Dansby, Sr
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pitts v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Dexter Payne and Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughn v. The State of Arkansas / ADC
as 4:2024cv04030
Petitioner:
Walter Earnest Vaughn, III
Respondent:
The State of Arkansas / ADC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bobbitt v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 4:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mason Bobbitt
Defendant:
US Marshals, USA, PCRDF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ybarra v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04026
Petitioner:
Amber Ybarra
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lambert v. Payne
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dorletha Lambert
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
