Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 128
Mendez v. Unknown Correctional Officer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2014cv04528
Plaintiff: Raphael Mendez
Defendant: Mr. Gilk, Calvin Wedington, Other Unknown at FMC Rochester, Minn. et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Raphael Mendez v. Counselor Rosemark, et al
as 14-2951
Plaintiff - Appellant: Raphael Mendez
Defendant - Appellee: Counselor Rosemark, Case Manager Cosette and Other Unknown Members at FMC Rochester, Minnesota, et al.
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. 4.119 acres of land, more or less, lying in Township 150 North, Range 98 West, 5th P.M. Section 13: S1/2 NW1/4 and SW1/4 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00043
Plaintiff: WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Defendant: 4.119 acres of land, more or less, lying in Township 150 North, Range 98 West, 5th P.M. Section 13: S1/2 NW1/4 and SW1/4, 1.559 acres of land, more or less, lying in Township 149 North, Range 98 West, 5th P.M. Section 14: S1/2NW1/4, 10.688 acres of land, more or less, lying in Township 149 North, Range 98 West, 5th P.M. Section 28: NW1/4NW1/4 Section 29: N1/2N1/2 Section 30: NE1/4 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mendez v. Rosemark et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2014cv00402
Plaintiff: Raphael Mendez
Defendant: Rosemark, Ms. Cosette and and Other UNKNOWN members at FMC Rochester, Minnesota et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall Burns, et al v. Tracy Carlson, et al
as 13-3782
Plaintiff - Appellant: Randall E. Burns, The Estate of Nicole Burns, deceased, will proceed under Missouri Rule 52.13(a)(1), under substitution of Plaintiff Randall E. Burns, Father and Amanda Burns
Defendant - Appellee: Tracy Carlson, Prosecuting Attorney, Linn County, Missouri, County of Linn, Missouri and City of Brookfield, Missouri, Others Unknown to the Plaintiffs at this time
Bond v. Holder et al
as 0:2013cv03143
Plaintiff: Frederick Ogan Bond
Defendant: Eric Holder, John R. Marti, Richard Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blondell Mitchell v. Rick Sanchez, et al
as 13-3318
Plaintiff - Appellant: Blondell Mitchell
Defendant - Appellee: Rick Sanchez, Unknown #4, filed as Rich Sanchez's staff and program manager's individually, Cable Network News, (CNN) and Responsible Management Teams (individually) and others
Alliance Pipeline L.P. v. 1.185 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Sublot 7 in the NE/4NE/4 of Section 26, Township 157 North, Range 95 West, Williams County, North Dakota et al
as 4:2013cv00045
Plaintiff: Alliance Pipeline L.P.
Defendant: 1.185 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Sublot 7 in the NE/4NE/4 of Section 26, Township 157 North, Range 95 West, Williams County, North Dakota, Tesoro High Plains Pipeline Company and All Other Unknown Owners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Alliance Pipeline L.P. v. Nels Norstedt, et al
as 13-1256
Plaintiff - Appellee: Alliance Pipeline L.P.
Defendant: 2.679 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the N/2NW/4 of Section 24, Township 158 North, Range 94 West, Mountrail County, North Dakota, 2.963 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the S/2SW/4 of Section 13, Township 158 North, Range 94 West, Mountrail County, North Dakota, 1.241 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the N/2SW/4 of Section 13, Township 158 North, Range 94 West, Mountrail County, North Dakota and others
Defendant - Appellant: Nels Norstedt, Starla Norstedt, Wayne Blikre and others
Alliance Pipeline, L.P. v. 7.320 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the SE/4 of Section 31, Township 162 North, Range 88 West, Burke County, North Dakota et al
as 4:2012cv00152
Plaintiff: Alliance Pipeline, L.P.
Defendant: 7.320 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the SE/4 of Section 31, Township 162 North, Range 88 West, Burke County, North Dakota , Dennis Bauer and All Other Unknown Owners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?