Cases 111 - 120 of 349,785
Dudley v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dudley
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Moore v. Reyes et al
as 5:2024cv05032
Petitioner:
Nakota Moore
Respondent:
Alex Reyes and Attorney General of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lightfeather v. Nebraska Department of Corrections religous cordnator Rucker et al
as 8:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Nebraska Department of Corrections religous cordnator Rucker, Nebraska Department of Corrections Director Robert Jeffreys, Nebraska Department of Corrections LPN Nuse Lori Decoster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Socolova v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01856
Plaintiff:
Liubovi Socolova
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Yexley v. Clark County et al
as 1:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wade Yexley
Defendant:
Clark County, Jeff Kollars, Kellie Wasko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Augustus Light v. United States
as 24-2030
Petitioner:
Augustus Quintrell Light, also known as Stow
Respondent:
United States of America
Rosa Mejia-Lopez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-2027
Petitioner:
Rosa Mejia-Lopez, P.T.M., S.T.M. and others
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland
Axiom Product Administration v. Dan O'Brien, et al
as 24-2025
Plaintiff:
Axiom Product Administration
Defendant:
Dan O'Brien, an individual, DMO Auto Acquisitions LLC, DMO North Hampton LLC and others
United States v. James Thomas
as 24-2032
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Thomas
United States v. Richard Gamblin
as 24-2034
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard Blane Gamblin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
