Cases 161 - 170 of 349
Rossman v. Gembicki et al
as 0:2016cv02875
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossman
Defendant:
Mark Gembicki, John Doe-1, John Doe-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rossmann v. Henricks
as 3:2016cv00308
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann
Defendant:
Patricia Henricks, John Doe-1, John Doe-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rossmann v. Daniello et al
as 4:2016cv04120
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann
Defendant:
Dan Daniello, John Doe-1, John Doe-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmidt v. Willoughby et al
as 1:2016cv00160
Plaintiff:
Justin L. Schmidt
Defendant:
Robert Willoughby , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Lufkin v. Robert Dooley, et al
as 16-2126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dennis Lufkin
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert Dooley, Director of Prisons, Jennifer Stanwick, Warden, in her individual capacity, Josh Klimek, Unit Manager, in his individual capacity and others
Porter v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02103
Plaintiff:
Chrystal Porter
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc. , John Doe, 1, John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brakeall v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2016cv04057
Plaintiff:
Winston Grey Brakeall
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valizadeh v. Doe et al
as 5:2016cv05020
Plaintiff:
Valizadeh and Daryush Valizadeh
Defendant:
Doe, Jane Doe and Jane and John Does, 2-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey et al v. Dippel et al
as 5:2016cv05068
Plaintiff:
Alvin Bailey and Ife Bailey
Defendant:
Ada Maye Jones Dippel , CRST Expedited, Inc. , John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
John Doe v. Avid Life Media, Inc., et al
as 4:2015cv01878
Defendant:
Avid Life Media, Inc. and Avid Dating Life, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 , John Doe #2 , John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
