Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees, Division/IBT v. Iowa Interstate Railroad, LTD
as 3:2009cv00094
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees, Division/IBT and Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees, Division/IBT
Defendant:
Iowa Interstate Railroad, LTD
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division/IBT
as 8:2008cv00409
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division/IBT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2008cv00142
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees and Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United Transportation Union Local 418 et al v. Boardman et al
as 5:2007cv04100
Plaintiff:
United Transportation Union Local 418, Burlington System Division of the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees, Burlington Northern System Federation of the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees and others
Defendant:
Joseph H Boardman, Federal Railroad Administration, Mary E Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division of International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Soo Line Railroad Company
as 0:2007cv01782
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division of International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Defendant:
Soo Line Railroad Company and Soo Line Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
