Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Tully et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 0:2010cv04734
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Tully , Thane T. Truax , Vicki K. Truax and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP , Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richemont International, S.A et al v. Cenaiko
as 0:2009cv03189
Plaintiff:
Richemont International, S.A, Richemont International, S.A, Richemont International, S.A and others
Defendant:
Nicholas Cenaiko
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Type:
Other Statutes
Wheatacow Club v. Cartier et al
as 3:2009cv00030
Plaintiff:
Wheatacow Club
Defendant:
Catherine Cartier, USA and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Cartier v. Nemaha County Jail
as 4:2008cv03162
Petitioner:
Justin Cartier
Respondent:
Nemaha County Jail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cartier v. George et al
as 0:2008cv01323
Plaintiff:
John Richard Cartier and John Richard Cartier
Defendant:
Ryan George, Ryan Arbuckle and White Bear Lake, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Steven Cartier
as 07-3222
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States
Defendant - Appellant:
Steven Bruce Cartier
Richemont International, S.A et al v. David M Clarkson et al
as 0:2007cv01641
Plaintiff:
Richemont International, S.A , Richemont International, N.A. , Cartier International N.V and others
Defendant:
David M Clarkson, Replicas of Distinction, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Trustees of the Minnesota Cement Masons and Plasterers Fringe Benefit Funds, The v. Gladstone Construction, Inc. et al
as 0:2007cv00496
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Minnesota Cement Masons and Plasterers Fringe Benefit Funds, The and Trustees of the Minnesota Cement Masons and Plasterers Fringe Benefit Funds, The
Defendant:
Gladstone Construction, Inc. and Dorothy M. Cartier
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
