Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv02817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv03559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Riley v. Central Credit Services, Inc.
as 4:2009cv01135
Plaintiff:
Jerome Riley
Defendant:
Central Credit Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Makohoniuk, et al v. Central Credit Services Inc, et al
as 4:2009cv00185
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services, L.L.C., Central Credit Services Inc, Mike Orlando and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Makohoniuk, Richard Makohoniuk, Tara Makohoniuk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Daugherty v. Nelson Watson & Association, LLC et al
as 4:2008cv01967
Plaintiff:
Lori Daugherty and Lori Daugherty
Defendant:
Nelson Watson & Associates, LLC and Central Credit Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Seeman v. Central Credit Services, Inc.
as 0:2008cv02104
Plaintiff:
Travis Seeman
Defendant:
Central Credit Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Owens v. Central Credit Services Inc
as 5:2007cv04029
Plaintiff:
Joe Owens
Defendant:
Central Credit Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
