Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Chestnut et al v. Klund et al
as 0:2022cv02714
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lewis Chestnut, Lawrence Anthony Barnes, Charles Nguyen Thorstad and others
Defendant:
Darcy Klund, Michael Kennedy, Joseph Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dailing Legacy, LLC et al v. Upton Township et al
as 6:2022cv03236
Plaintiff:
Dailing Legacy, LLC and Clarence W Dailing
Defendant:
Upton Township, Don Stilley, Darcie Manion and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Becker et al v. City of Hillsboro, Missouri
as 4:2022cv00886
Plaintiff:
William Becker and Darcy Lynch
Defendant:
City of Hillsboro, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cress v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 0:2022cv01664
Plaintiff:
Darcy J Cress and Darcy J. Cress
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Havel-Sturdevant v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Darcy Havel-Sturdevant
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Billie Hovick, et al v. Darci Patterson, et al
as 21-2493
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Billie Jo Hovick and Larry Jon Hovick
Defendant / Appellee:
Darci Patterson, Halicia Brown and Kristin Walker
Shaw v. Adams
as 4:2021cv00707
Petitioner:
Adrian Darcy Shaw
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
West v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2021cv01280
Defendant:
Tyler Klund, Paul Huynh, Richard Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Damarlo Marcelle West and Damarlo West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Block-Nelson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Darcy Block-Nelson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Shaw v. Ulman et al
as 4:2021cv00191
Defendant:
Jimmie Edwards, Julie Johnson, Marissa Ulman and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Darcy Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
