Cases 11 - 20 of 27
McPherson v. Ramey et al
as 2:2019cv04101
Defendant:
Eland Unknown, J. Cofield, Unknown Dittman and others
Plaintiff:
Chang Bruno McPherson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McPherson v. Ramey et al
as 4:2019cv00900
Defendant:
J. Cofield, Unknown Dittman, Tammy Surface and others
Plaintiff:
Chang Bruno McPherson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv04058
Defendant:
Cindy Griffith, Dittman, John Gerke and others
Plaintiff:
Roy D. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reece v. Honard et al
as 2:2018cv04050
Plaintiff:
Gerry D Reece
Defendant:
Honard, D Barter, David Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kingston DA GOD v. Jefferson City Correctional Center Staff et al
as 2:2017cv04228
Plaintiff:
Universal-Unison A Kingston DA GOD
Defendant:
Jefferson City Correctional Center Staff, R L Baysinger, Stanley Keely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lagares, Jr. v. Colgan et al
as 6:2017cv03245
Plaintiff:
Dennis A. Lagares, Jr.
Defendant:
Amanda Rollins Colgan, Shawn Patrick Colgan, Jr., Richelle L. Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Proby v. Bullock et al
as 4:2014cv01355
Plaintiff:
George Proby, Jr.
Defendant:
D. R. Bullock, Christy Ramsey, Unknown Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Ruppell et al
as 4:2012cv02337
Plaintiff:
Rafael A. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Edward Ruppell, Almilee Dittman, Michael Reagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darren Lee v. Jeremiah Nixon, et al
as 12-2621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darren Lee
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, George Lombardi, Gale E. Bailey and others
Eugene Jones-El v. David Webster, et al
as 12-2159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eugene Kenneth Jones-El
Defendant - Appellee:
David Webster, Dave Courm, Edward L. Ruppel and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
