Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 303
Right Choice Managed Care, et al v. Mark Blake
as 24-1659
Plaintiff: Right Choice Managed Care, Inc., Blue Cross of California, Inc., doing business as Anthem Blue Cross, Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Hospital Partners, Inc., Hospital Laboratory Partners, LLC, RAJ Enterprises of Central Florida, LLC, Pinnacle Laboratory Services and others
State of West Virginia, et al v. SEC
as 24-1634
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Georgia, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Microtel Inns and Suites Franchising, Inc. v. ANS Hospitality LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00905
Plaintiff: MICROTEL INNS AND SUITES FRANCHISING, INC., a Georgia Corporation and Microtel Inns and Suites Franchising, Inc.
Defendant: ANS HOSPITALITY LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company, RAJNIKANT PATEL, CHETANKUMAR PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Gonzalez Bravo v. Graydaze Contracting, INC et al
as 4:2024cv00064
Plaintiff: GERMAN MAURICIO GONZALEZ BRAVO
Defendant: GRAYDAZE CONTRACTING, INC and GEORGIA CAPITAL CONTRACTORS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Failure to Pay Earned Compensation
Cellco Partnership v. Windstream Kentucky East LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01015
Plaintiff: Cellco Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless doing business as MCI Communications Services LLC
Defendant: Windstream Kentucky East LLC, Windstream Georgia Communications LLC, Windstream Iowa Communications LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., et al v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 23-3230
Plaintiff / Appellant: Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota and others
Defendant / Appellee: Merrick B. Garland, in his Official Capacity, as Attorney General of the United States, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The and Steven Dettelbach, in his Official Capacity, as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Appellant: Members of Congress
Veera Daruwalla, et al v. John Pentz
as 23-2798
Not Classified By Court: In re: T-Mobile Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
Plaintiff / Appellee: Veera Daruwalla, Washington Western, 2:23-cv-01118, Peter Luna, Washington Western, 2:21-cv-01324, Michael March, Washington Western, 2:21-cv-01118 and others
Defendant: T-Mobile US, Inc., Does, 1 through 100, California Central, 2:21-cv-07531 and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Appellant: John Pentz, as representative to the Estate of Connie Pentz and John Jacob Pentz, III, as representative to the Estate of Connie Pentz
Leggett & Platt, Inc. et al v. Employbridge, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv05052
Plaintiff: LEGGETT & PLATT, INC. L&P TRANSPORTATION, LLC and CREST- FOAM CORPORATION, Leggett & Platt, Inc., L&P Transportation, LLC and others
Defendant: EMPLOYBRIDGE, LLC f/k/a, KOOSHAREM, LLC, PROFESSIONAL DRIVERS OF GEORGIA, INC. d/b/a PRODRIVERS, Employbridge, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Veera Daruwalla, et al v. Cassie Hampe
as 23-2744
Not Classified By Court: In re: T-Mobile Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
Plaintiff / Appellee: Veera Daruwalla, Washington Western, 2:23-cv-01118, John G. Cooke, Washington Western, 2:21-cv-01324, Michael March, Washington Western, 2:21-cv-01118 and others
Defendant: T-Mobile US, Inc., Does, 1 through 100, California Central, 2:21-cv-07531 and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Appellant: Cassie Hampe
Jones-Williams v. Missouri State et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00947
Defendant: Beverly Barnett Parker, Missouri State, County of St. Louis and others
Plaintiff: Rozina Rhonda Jones-Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?