Cases 11 - 20 of 31
James Blue Thunder v. M.S. Smith, et al
as 19-1200
Respondent:
M.S. Smith, Warden and United States Parole Commission
Petitioner:
James David Blue Thunder
Smith et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2017cv01117
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Smith , Rexford Martin , Ronald Matheny and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McBroom v. Minnesota Correctional Facility - Oak Park Heights
as 0:2016cv00740
Petitioner:
James David McBroom
Respondent:
Minnesota Correctional Facility - Oak Park Heights
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McBroom v. Roy et al
as 0:2015cv02791
Plaintiff:
James David McBroom
Defendant:
Tom Roy, Kent Grandlienard, Minnesota Correction Facility - Oak Park Heights and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. National Football League et al
as 0:2014cv03603
Plaintiff:
James David Wilkins, Jr.
Defendant:
National Football League, NFL Films, Inc. and NFL Productions, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
McBroom v. MCF Oak Park Heights et al
as 0:2014cv03124
Petitioner:
James David McBroom
Respondent:
MCF Oak Park Heights and Kent Grandlienard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Merrick v. Bowersox
as 4:2013cv00309
Petitioner:
James David Merrick
Respondent:
Michael Bowersox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James David Blue Thunder v. United State
as 11-3174
Petitioner:
James David Blue Thunder
Respondent:
United States of America
Cochran v. Farver
as 5:2011cv00036
Plaintiff:
James David Cochran
Defendant:
Ricky D Farver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James David Blue Thunder v. United States of America
as 4:2010cv04112
Movant:
James David Blue Thunder
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
