Cases 11 - 20 of 218
Lang et al v. Schmitt
as 1:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
Korrine Lang and Lloyd Kleppe
Defendant:
Cody Rodney Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eason v. Summit et al
as 1:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Jakeem Eason
Defendant:
Unknown Summit, K. Goggins, C. Schmitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones-Williams v. Missouri State et al
as 4:2023cv00947
Defendant:
Beverly Barnett Parker, Missouri State, County of St. Louis and others
Plaintiff:
Rozina Rhonda Jones-Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobson v. Schmitt
as 4:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
Yule Hobson
Defendant:
Eric Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dustin Curtis v. State of Missouri, et al
as 23-1868
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dustin Patrick Curtis
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Missouri, St. Charles County Correctional Center, St. Peters Police Department and others
DeManuele v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
Sean DeManuele
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Joseph Schmitt, William Olsten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Benson et al v. Bailey et al
as 4:2022cv01355
Plaintiff:
Ronald Benson, Derrick Hall, Dawn Johnson and others
Defendant:
Eric Schmitt, Michael Sack, St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scharnhorst v. Cantrell et al
as 5:2022cv05243
Plaintiff:
John William Scharnhorst, III
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Jay Cantrell, Captain Nolan Ake, Sergeant Carlos Pineda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlos Wade v. Bill Stange, et al
as 22-3609
Petitioner / Appellant:
Carlos Wade
Respondent / Appellee:
Bill Stange, Warden, Southeastern Correctional Center and Eric Stephen Schmitt
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
