Cases 11 - 20 of 154
Williams v. G Shift Officers et al
as 8:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J. Williams
Defendant:
G Shift Officers, T. Stanton, Ms. R. Swearingen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newman v. Stanton
as 2:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Vincent D. Newman
Respondent:
Clay Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pinkins v. Stanton
as 2:2023cv00046
Petitioner:
Markell L. Pinkins
Respondent:
Clay Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Redington
as 2:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
Derik Davis
Respondent:
Dan Redington and Clay Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
William Taylor, Mario Debarros, Alphadel McKee and others
Defendant:
3M Company
North American Company for Life and Health Insurance v. Stanton
as 2:2023cv04032
Plaintiff:
North American Company for Life and Health Insurance
Defendant:
Richard Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Mozuch-Stafford v. Ramsey County et al
as 0:2022cv02250
Plaintiff:
Miri Monique Mozuch-Stafford
Defendant:
Ramsey County, Thomas Kunkel, Lauren Arnevik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanton v. Gomey Allenberg & O'Reilly, PC
as 0:2022cv01706
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Stanton
Defendant:
Gomey Allenberg & O'Reilly, PC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kamisha Stanton v. Cash Advance Centers, Inc
as 22-1466
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Kamisha Stanton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
Cash Advance Centers, Inc, a Delaware corporation
Deborah Kostedt, et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al
as 22-1457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Deborah Kostedt, Jill Amos-Polifka, Sharon Anderson and others
Defendant / Appellee:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Defendant:
Doe Manufacturers, 1-100
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
